Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
The student will conduct a scientific literature review using various web-based search engines, develop a literature matrix, and write a scholarly paper that briefly summarizes the literature that addresses the DNP clinical problem. Use the same problem statement and purpose statement from Assignment 2 for the DNP Project. The purpose of this assignment is to begin the review of the literature to support the DNP Project that will start in NSG 7431 Project I, Mentored Scholarship.
Assignment Criteria:
Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:
Develop/Revise and write a problem statement for the identified DNP clinical problem
Develop/Revise a purpose statement for the identified DNP clinical problem.
Discuss the purpose of the identified DNP clinical problem, which can be a continuation of Assignment 2.
Discuss the search criteria used to locate the journal articles, including databases, keywords
Identify and define potential variables or concepts for the identified DNP clinical problem found in the literature review.
Locate ten professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles to support the identified DNP Clinical practice problem (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) that are less than five (5) years old. You may use seminal sources in the assignment, especially those related to your theoretical frameworks, tools, and instruments.
Articles for clinical problem
Articles for population and problem
Articles for theoretical framework/quality improvement/EBP model
Articles for tools or instruments to measure the problem
Articles for approaches to address the clinical problem of the DNP Intervention
Create a table to help formulate a scholarly literature matrix (see Modules/Week 3 for a matrix template). The last column titled Use of Evidence – make sure to state WHAT you will apply or avoid using from the article to YOUR DNP Project.
The scholarly paper should provide a brief literature overview and relate the articles to the identified DNP clinical problem.
Include an introductory paragraph, a purpose statement, and a conclusion.
Attach the literature matrix as an appendix to the above scholarly paper.
Write the paper in the third person, not the first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, and our may are not used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
APA format required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).
Submit the assignment to Turnitin before the final submission, review the originality report, and make any needed changes.
Submit by the posted due date.
Assignment 3: Literature Review for DNP Clinical Problem Matrix and Scholarly Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
Assignment Criteria
10 pts
Proficient
All topics/criteria addressed and all questions fully answered.
7 pts
Competent
All topics/criteria addressed and most questions fully answered.
4 pts
Adequate
All topics/criteria addressed and most questions partially answered.
1 pts
Novice
One or more topics/criteria not addressed or completely answered.
/ 10 pts
Quality/Accuracy of Information
10 pts
Proficient
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It includes several supporting details and/or examples.
7 pts
Competent
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It provides supporting details and/or examples.
4 pts
Adequate
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. A few details and/or examples are given.
1 pts
Novice
Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic/criteria.
/ 10 pts
Organization
5 pts
Proficient
Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading.
4 pts
Competent
Information organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading.
3 pts
Adequate
There is an attempt at organization but errors exist. No levels of heading.
1 pts
Novice
The information or overall structure appears disorganized.
/ 5 pts
Sources
4 pts
Proficient
All references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe, or a classic/ historical source.
3 pts
Competent
The majority of references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe or a classic/historical source.
2 pts
Adequate
Some references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years.
1 pts
Novice
Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years.
/ 4 pts
APA
0 pts
Adequate
0 pts
Competent
0 pts
Novice
0 pts
Proficient
Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or grammar.
/ 0 pts
Total Points: 0
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.