Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
We are conducting a systematic review and aim to follow the PRISMA 2020 checklist and vancouver citation style. However, our current draft lacks in-depth information in several areas. After screening, we included 19 articles in our review. We are unsure if we used the appropriate risk of bias assessment tools and were unable to determine the level of evidence, which is a requirement for this systematic review.
In the attached file, we have written the methods, results, and discussion sections, but the content is not of high quality and lacks accurate information. We kindly request your assistance in rewriting these sections to make them suitable for presentation to the jury. It is crucial that the risk of bias assessment, level of evidence, and the evidence table are corrected and organized appropriately for a systematic review.
Please formulate the revised content based on the methods we used in the file, but feel free to make adaptations as needed. However, we require a better structured methods section, as our supervisors have already reviewed the current version.
Important note to mention, we used ROB1 instead of ROB2 in the file i have attached and our supervisors want the ROB2. Thats incase if you are gonna keep using the ROB risk of bias tools.
Thank you for your assistance in improving the quality and presentation of our systematic review.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.