Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
In the article “Why Hope Is Dangerous When It Comes to Climate Change” by Tommy Lynch, the author explores the role of hope in the face of the impending climate crisis. Drawing on the arguments presented by David Wallace-Wells and other experts, Lynch analyzes the tensions between hope, pessimism, and the urgent need for action. Your task is to write a rhetorical analysis essay in which you examine Lynch’s purpose for writing this text and the rhetorical strategies he uses to accomplish it, and evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies in persuading the audience.
Part 1: The expectation is that you analyze the Lynch’s use of logos, ethos, and pathos (or a combination of two that you find to be dominant in his essay). How does Lynch appeal to reason, credibility, and emotion to support his argument? Identify specific examples of evidence, statistics, and anecdotes used to appeal to the reader’s logic, trust in the author, and emotional response. To explore these elements please examine Lynch’s writing style and tone. Question to promote critical thinking: “How does he use language (diction) and tone to establish his position and connect with the audience?” Please try to discuss the impact of Lynch’s stylistic choices on the overall persuasiveness of the essay.
Part 2: It is also important to pay attention to Lynch’s awareness of his target audience(s). How does Lynch tailor his message to resonate with the intended readership? Consider whether Lynch effectively anticipates and addresses the concerns or perspectives of his audience. Examine how Lynch envisions his essay influencing the reader’s perspective or behavior. Question to promote critical thinking: “Does he seek to inspire action, provoke thought, or foster a particular emotional response? Discuss any strategies used by Lynch to make his purpose clear and compelling to the reader. How does he align his purpose with the urgency of the climate crisis?
Part 3: Lastly, it is important to explore Lynch’s purpose for writing this essay. Investigate his overarching purpose in writing this essay. Question to promote critical thinking: What is Lynch’s primary goal or intention in addressing the relationship between hope and climate change? Analyze whether Lynch aims to inform, persuade, entertain, or provoke a specific response from the audience. How does this purpose shape the rhetorical choices made throughout the essay?
To conclude the essay, return to your argument and consider how you have made it, revisiting key points about rhetorical strategies you have observed and analyzed in Lynch’s article.
This assignment does not ask you to argue for or against the essay’s topic. Rather, you will be writing more about the techniques the author uses than the topic of their essay. Be sure to review “What is Rhetorical Analysis?” in the E-book and in Canvas (PDF under Files and Module 1) for further help in developing your analysis.
Formatting and Requirements
Please write somewhere that will allow you to draft and will automatically save as you go, and you can continue to write, revise and change your draft until you submit it. Refer to the instructions and draft goals for help as you write.
Your essay should be approximately 3-4 pages in length (around 1000-1200 words).
Include your name, my name, class and date in the upper left corner of the 1st page.
Format your essay according to MLA guidelines (see Documenting Sources: MLA Style in Achieve).
Include a Works Cited page listing all sources you used or consulted.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.